|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H3C-CCl3 |
|
|
|
PDF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chlorine |
|
|
|
Nuclear
Quadrupole Coupling Constants |
|
|
in Methyl Chloroform
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The complete chlorine nqcc tensor in methyl chloroform was
determined by Dore and Kisiel [1]. Carpenter et al. [2] had previously
determined the component along the CCl bond. An effective molecular
structure was reported by Holm et al. [3]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of the chlorine nqcc's
in methyl chloroform was made on a molecular structure derived ab
initio, with correction (see below). These are compared with
the experimental values in Tables 1 and 2. Structure parameters
and atomic coordinates are given in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The results of calculation made on the effective molecular structure of Holm et al. can be seen here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coordinate Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xuu is the component of the nqcc tensor along the
threefold symmetry axis. Corresponding to the atomic coordinates
given below in Table 4, Xvv and Xww are the components
along the v- and w- axes for the Cl atom in the uv-plane. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscripts x,y,z refer to the principal
axes of the nqcc tensor. The y-axis is chosen coincident with the
w-axis. Ø (degrees) is the angle between its subscripted parameters.
ETA = (Xxx - Xyy)/Xzz. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMS is the root mean square
difference between caalculated and experimental diagonal nqcc's
(percent of the average experimental nqcc). RSD is the residual
standard deviation of calibration of the model for calculation of the
nqcc's. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 1. Chlorine nqcc's in H3C-CCl3 (MHz). The subscripts cc, etc.
in parentheses are the axes labels of Ref. [1]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calc. |
|
Expt. [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35Cl |
Xuu(cc) |
|
26.92 |
|
26.8907(9) |
|
|
|
Xvv(aa) |
- |
65.74 |
- |
65.5378(12) |
|
|
|
Xww(bb) |
|
38.82 |
|
38.6472(12) |
|
|
|
Xuv(ac) |
|
36.66 |
|
36.510(23) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMS |
|
0.15 (0.35 %) |
|
|
|
|
|
RSD |
|
0.49 (1.1 %) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xxx |
|
39.68 |
|
39.571(14) |
|
|
|
Xyy |
|
38.82 |
|
38.6472(12) |
|
|
|
Xzz |
- |
78.49 |
- |
78.218(14) |
|
|
|
ETA |
- |
0.0109 |
- |
0.0118(2) |
|
|
|
Øz,u |
|
70.82 |
|
70.846(9) |
|
|
|
Øu,CCl |
|
69.80 |
|
69.82 * |
|
|
|
Øz,CCl |
|
1.03 |
|
1.05 * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Calculated here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The pyramid formed by the z-principal axes of the three Cl nqcc
tensors is somewhat 'flatter' than the molecular pyramid. This is
typical of the pyramidal trichlorides. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2. 37Cl
nqcc's in 37Cl35Cl2CCH3
(MHz). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calc. |
|
Expt. [1] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37Cl |
Xaa |
- |
52.46 |
-
|
52.3028(16) |
|
|
|
Xbb |
|
30.59 |
|
30.4585(16) |
|
|
|
Xcc |
|
21.87 |
|
21.8443(11) |
|
|
|
|Xac| |
|
28.05 |
|
28.032(76) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMS |
|
0.12 (0.35 %) |
|
|
|
|
|
RSD |
|
0.44 (1.1 %) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xxx |
|
31.27 |
|
31.249(46) |
|
|
|
Xyy |
|
30.59 |
|
30.4585(16) |
|
|
|
Xzz |
- |
61.86 |
- |
61.708(46) |
|
|
|
ETA |
- |
0.0109 |
- |
0.0128(7) |
|
|
|
Øz,c |
|
71.48 |
|
71.45(4) |
|
|
|
Øc,CCl |
|
70.45 |
|
70.45 * |
|
|
|
Øz,CCl |
|
1.03 |
|
1.00 * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Calculated here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Molecular Structure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The molecular structure was optimized
at the MP2/6-311+G(d,p) level of theory assuming Cs symmetry.
The optimized CC single bond length was then corrected using the
equation obtained from linear regression analysis of the data given in
Table IX of Ref.[6]. Likewise, the optimized CF bond lengths were
corrected by regression analysis of the data given in Table VI of Ref.[5].
For the CCl bond, the structure was optimized at the MP2/6-311+G(2d,p)
level and corrected by linear regression analysis of the data given in Table
4 of Ref.[4]. The CH bond lengths were corrected using r = 1.001 ropt,
where ropt is obtained by MP2/6-31G(d,p) optimization [7].
Interatomic angles used in the calculation are those given by B3P86/6-311+G(3d,3p)
optimization. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Table 3. Molecular structure parameters (Å and degrees). |
|
|
|
|
|
CCl |
1.7724 |
|
|
CC |
1.507 |
|
|
CH |
1.087 |
|
|
CCH |
109.33 |
|
|
CCCl |
110.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Table 3. Atomic coordinates. |
| (More figures are shown than are significant.) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
u (Å) |
|
v (Å) |
|
w (Å) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cl |
- |
0.360966 |
|
1.663358 |
|
0.0 |
|
Cl |
- |
0.360966 |
- |
0.831679 |
± |
1.440510 |
|
C |
|
0.251115 |
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
C |
|
1.758115 |
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
H |
|
2.117952 |
- |
1.025713 |
|
0.0 |
|
H |
|
2.117952 |
|
0.512856 |
± |
0.888293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] L.Dore and Z.Kisiel, J.Mol.Spectrosc. 189,228(1998). |
|
|
[2] J.H.Carpenter, P.J.Seo, and D.H.Whiffen, J.Mol.Spectrosc.
120,219(1986). |
|
|
[3] R.Holm, M.Mitzlaff, and H.Hartmann, Z.Naturforsch. 23a,307(1968). |
|
|
[4] I.Merke, L.Poteau, G.Wlodarczak,
A.Bouddou, and J.Demaison, J.Mol.Spectrosc. 177,232(1996). |
|
|
[5] R.M.Villamañan, W.D.Chen,
G.Wlodarczak, J.Demaison, A.G.Lesarri, J.C.López, and J.L.Alonso,
J.Mol.Spectrosc. 171,223(1995). |
|
|
[6] J.Demaison, J.Cosléou, R.Bocquet,
and A.G.Lesarri, J.Mol. Spectrosc. 167,400(1994). |
|
|
[7] J.Demaison and G.Wlodarczak, Structural
Chem. 5,57(1994). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CFCl3 |
SiHCl3 |
F3C-CCl3 |
OPCl3 |
|
|
NCl3 |
PCl3 |
AsCl3 |
SPCl3 |
|
|
CH3Cl |
CH2Cl2 |
CHCl3 |
CH3CH2Cl |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Go back |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table of Contents |
|
|
|
|
|
Molecules/Chlorine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH3CCl3.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last
Modified 18 July 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|